“Nature is not mute. It is man who is deaf.” - Terence Mckenna If we accept that land is alive, and has spirit and the ability to communicate to us how (and whether) it wants to relate to us, how do we find out what that is? I've said that I respect Andras's family's patience in learning to hear from their land before diving in to constructing sacred sites on it, and it's something that I think Peter and I share. But what is it that we're "hearing," and how are we best to listen for it? This is where Andras's ideas and mine diverge--in theory, if not in practice. I'm tempted to go into detail here, explaining some examples of what happens when Pagans don't listen to the land, but instead arbitrarily impose their preconceived notions about what kinds of shrines they "get" to construct on land once they own it. Unfortunately, if I give specific examples, those who have been to those sites or were the ones to build them will
Welcome to the online journal of a pair of Quaker Pagans.