Skip to main content

On Falwell

As most people know, Jerry Falwell died yesterday.

I would not have found this subject worthy of comment in this blog, if it weren't for the fact that I've read more than one post, from Pagan bloggers who usually know better, who've reported this with a smug or even gleeful tone.

Needless to say, I'm unlikely to have been a fan of the man from Lynchburg, a man who said of September 11, 2001, "I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say 'you helped this happen.'"

But that is just not the point.

I really wanted not to write this entry. I have been hoping that, if I just ignored it, perhaps no one outside the Pagan community would read any of the blog entries that have depressed me this morning. But this willingness to try and score cheap points over the death of another human being... This is just not right.

You don't like the politics of the right wing of Christian fundamentalism, oh my people? Attack the politics. But not the man. An attack on a person does nothing to counter an idea... it just raises the volume on the discussion.

Intolerance of Christians--even Christians who are intolerant of us--is still wrong.

Everybody, please stop.

Comments

Anonymous said…
To be fair, there have also been a number of thoughtful posts on the subject - Wild Hunt and Sannion leap to mind.
Bright Crow said…
Cat,

I agree with you.

What's more, I remember that Rev. Falwell was moved to acknowledge, late in his life, that gayfolk ought to have civil rights, even though he did not approve of us morally.

I said a blessing for him when I heard of his death, affirming that he has moved on to a peace he did not seem to know here.

Blessed Be,
Michael BrightCrow
I'm pleased to read a much more compassionate and grounded response than some over on Deborah Oak's Branches Down. Of course, that's not entirely a surprise, coming from Deborah Oak... She's marvelous!
Carol Maltby said…
A moment's reflection upon the goings-on of the past two millennia might remind us that dying doesn't necessarily stop a person's influence.
Cat,
I had not noticed this post about Falwell's death until today.

Like you, I rejected and abhorred the public positions he took on social issues. I also felt, as a Christian, that he was seriously misrepresenting and causing scandal to the Christian gospel.

Nevertheless, I very much agree with you that rejoicing at his or any person's death (whether done by a pagan or a Christian or a totally non-religious person) or using the death to score cheap points is "just not right".
In some ways, I can imagine that the public presence of Christians like Jerry Falwell is as painful to many Christians--especially Quaker Christians, perhaps--as certain less savory Pagans are to me.

I still remember an old friend who grew up near Salem, Massachusetts, who told me that the only place she ever tucked her pentacle away, out of sight, was in that town, where the presence of so many self-promoting, kohl-eyed Witches in black simply embarassed her into the closet.

Sometimes, it's our theoretical allies who cause us the most pain...

Thanks for stopping by, Rich. (And I'm pleased to note that you've been posting to Brooklyn Quaker lately--you've been missed!)
Anonymous said…
How do.

As a christocentric type Quake I wasn't all that impressed with Falwell's politics/religion either. The Christian term for it is heresy: twisting the teaching of the faith so that people thing wrong is right and up is down.

But hating him for it really is beside the point. If he taught hatred, and I hate him for it -- what am I? And what would Jesus do? And the Christ Spirit in me knows the answer to those questions and so do I.

But more to the point, its wasted energy. Falwell was a teacher and preacher, which means if he did harm its because people listened, and people listened because what he said spoke to them at some level. Its not Falwell, but the spirit he spoke for, that spoke through him, and resonated in so many hearts.

Hating him, is rather like stamping on one termite when your whole house is infested. It may make you feel good in the moment but it hardly addresses the issue.
Bernulf said…
"If he taught hatred, and I hate him for it -- what am I?"

- A lamentably good student.

Cat, I enjoyed reading this post of yours - you echoed the very same reasons I chose not to write about him or his death, and I think you make a very good point when you remind everyone to keep the focus on the politics and the ideas, rather than on personal attacks.
Anonymous said…
Thank you, Cat. - Stasa

Popular posts from this blog

Peter on Grief and Communities

Well, that was unexpected. For the last year, ever since my mom's health took a sharp downturn, I've been my dad's ride to Florence Congregational Church on Sundays. That community has been important for my dad and the weekly outing with me was something he always looked forward to and enjoyed, so I didn't mind taking him there. It meant giving up attending my own Quaker meeting for the duration, but I had already been questioning whether silent waiting worship was working for me. I was ready for a sabbatical. A month ago, my dad was Section-Twelved into a geriatric psych hospital when his dementia started to make him emotionally volatile. I had been visiting him every day at his assisted living facility which was right on my way home from work, but the hospital was almost an hour away. I didn't see him at all for three weeks, and when I did visit him there, it actually took me a couple of seconds to recognize him. He was slumped forward in a wheel chair, lo...

A Quaker Pagan Day Book: Testimonies and Queries

Pagans often argue about how to define who we are.  What are the boundaries--between Wicca and Witchcraft, between Heathens and Pagans, between polytheists, pantheists, and non-theists...  While I could do without the acrimony, we're a new as well as an old religious movement, so it makes sense that like any adolescent, we are fascinated by questions of identity. I will admit to preferring the Quaker approach to identity, though: rather than trying to create the definitive checklist of belief that make someone a "real Quaker," Friends typically share a body of testimonies and questions for reflection with those who are drawn to the Religious Society of Friends. "Do you feel this same sort of spiritual leading?" Friends ask one another.  "Does this speak to the condition of your soul, as it does to ours?" Queries, not checklists of doctrine, hold the ways Quakers approach discernment, including around membership.  And though no individual can declar...

Fame

(Note: there were so many thought provoking comments in response to this post that it generated a second-round of ideas. You can read the follow-up post here .) I have a confession to make. I want to be famous. Well, sort of. I don't want to be famous, famous, and ride around in a limousine and have to hire security and that sort of thing. I just want to write a book, have it published by somebody other than my mother, and bought and read by somebody other than my mother, and maybe even sign a couple of autographs along the way. Mom can have one autographed, too, if she wants. It has to be a spiritual book. A really moving and truthful book, that makes people want to look deep inside themselves, and then they come up to me and say something like, "It was all because of that book you wrote! It changed my life!" And I would say, no, no, really, you did all that, you and God/the gods --I'm a little fuzzy on whether the life-changing book is for Pagans or for Quake...