Skip to main content

Of Athames, Swords and Ploughshares

Recently, I blogged about my enjoyment of a sport I'm no longer able to practice: kendo-style sparring with padded swords (boffers, to those in the know). The same back injury that keeps me from sitting down as I type these words took the sword out of my hands for good--though the glory--at least with my 9th grade students--lives on.

I shared that story on the blog partly because it keeps my spirits up, in this long and pain-filled winter, to think of myself as active and athletic, rather than as injured and middle-aged. (Perhaps it's most accurate to admit that both are true.) But I also enjoy the irony of apparent contrasts: the aging Quaker lady, peering through spectacles on the bridge of her nose, who enjoys the immediacy and physicality of whacking somebody with a great big implement of destruction--while trying not to get whacked in return.

But there have been a number of thoughtful questions in response to my story, both here and in person. Wasn't this before I was a Quaker? one friend asked, with the implication that, surely, I would not engage in such a sport now. Doesn't this kind of thing undermine my pacifism? asked another.

The questions deserve serious thought. And nine years into my Quaker practice, maybe it's time to take stock of the state of my peace testimony--the thing that brought me into the Society of Friends to begin with, after all.

So--to start with the first question that occurs to me--if I could wield a sword again, would I?

Hell, yes. In a heartbeat.

Well, OK. Given the fact that whacking people with great big swords is not something Quakers are generally known for, why? What makes me miss it so much?

Well, it's physically exhilarating, the way skiing down a steep, icy mountainside, on a clear and bitterly chilly morning is exhilarating... that feeling of being on the edge of disaster, and the only thing that staves it off is being utterly and entirely present and in my body, reacting to my environment physically long before my brain can form any conscious thoughts about it at all.

For a very, very verbal person, perennially in my head, those moments of being forced to be wholly in my animal self are very precious.

And it's... beautiful. There is an element of grace in any sport done well, perhaps. But they call the composition of stage combat "choreography" for a reason: it is a dance. And perhaps I did not dance as gracefully as some, but I did love it, and for many of the same reasons I love to dance. It just feels... beautiful.

Finally, sparring also calls on my reserves of physical courage. Unlike a lot of women, I grew up spending most of my time with a brother, and the two of us fought like cats and dogs for years.

Now, the fighting I do regret--and I'm grateful we did outgrow the bitterness of our childhood battles. But the fact that our fights were often physical has meant, for me, that I'm a bit like my bichon frise dog in temperament: Priscylla Charybdis, who grew up with an English mastiff for a companion and chew toy, and has no fear of dogs or men. By the same token, I am not easily intimidated by people, including men, who are larger, stronger, or more aggressive than I am. I know what it feels like to get hurt, and, you know, it's not so terrible. You just get up and keep going.

And boffers, though padded so as not to do real injury, do hurt when they connect. They sting! And, well, for the sake of keeping this blog rated PG, let's just say that the rather silly looking armor they often depict Valkyries in doesn't look so silly after a few rounds getting stung by boff swords!

Now, don't get me wrong. The pain is not the point. But knowing that pain won't kill me, that it is transitory, and that I do not need to be paralyzed by it... that has been very important to my sense of who I am as a person.

I think that the cultivation of my physical courage, through sparring and through sports like aikido and karate (also no longer possible for me, alas) has helped me cultivate a kind of spiritual courage as well: the courage to face my shame at knowing when I have been wrong, and my willingness to risk openness and vulnerability really do feel connected to this willingness to take physical risks. I know how to hurt, how to take a blow and not panic, and in more than a physical sense. This has almost certainly nurtured me as a writer. And in my spiritual being, my willingness to go deep, to question myself, and to be open to embracing radical change all somehow have roots in this physicality.

However, there is a more direct spiritual connection with my Paganism, in my relationship with the horned god.

For years now, my primary relationship with a Pagan god has been with Herne, god of the hunt, of wildness, and of the exchange of life and death in the natural world.

And Herne is a god, among other things, of physical courage. He's the stag that is hunted and killed to feed the village, and he's the hunter who brings home that kill, all at the same time. He offers life and he takes it, because here on this planet, that's the deal. We all--even vegetarians--live at the cost of the lives of others. So Herne is the god of facing difficult truths, like what it really costs to be alive... and the fact of our own mortality.

I first undertook to study the sword as a direct outcome of my relationship with Herne, and as a result of an experience with a sexual predator in the Pagan community. After being threatened with rape in the context of a Pagan religious retreat--the very setting where a Pagan woman should be safest--I took a good hard look at what I had been taught about the athame, the Wiccan ritual knife used to symbolize will and the intellect, which is never, ever used to shed blood. So clear is this taboo, in fact, that some Wiccan traditions take it farther, and don't allow the use of an athame for any practical cutting at all, and have a completely separate blade (a boline or white-handled knife) for mundane tasks like chopping herbs or cutting up a dish of brownies to be handed round the circle during cakes and ale.

But part of what I took away from my painful experience was that I was not willing to sign on to an obligation to a passive kind of personal non-violence. I felt strongly that fighting back against an immediate physical threat was something it was OK to do. And it was in response to what I had been through that many of the male members of my then-congregation of Pagans created for me both an athame and a ritual that symbolized my right to defend my body--and the obligation of every man present to respect a woman's right to say no, and to defend her body's integrity. In giving me that knife, the men who participated in the ritual explicitly recognized my right to use it, to use it on any one of them, let alone on a stranger, if it were necessary to defend myself.

The athame itself was a physical manifestation of my relationship with Herne. Not only was it ground from high-quality steel to a very sharp edge, but its handle was made from the antler of a stag, Herne's own animal. That was in no way a coincidence.

It is hard to express what that knife meant to me. I had been made to feel powerless by one part of my Pagan community. Another chose to affirm my power--my right, as a living, breathing animal, to defend myself from predation.

This makes sense to me. Herne is the god of the animal world, and of the animal self. (As a Pagan I reject the notion that animals are "fallen" or soulless, or less than humans are.) And animals do use violence, though not for the kinds of motivations humans fall prey to: vengeance, envy, or spite. Moreover, when animals use violence, it is almost always either in order to eat, or to fend off an attack. Animals rarely resort to lethal violence against their own kind; their aim is life, not death.

As an animal, I feel that Herne recognizes my right of self-defense.

But also, as a human, I feel that Herne recognizes my right to choose. I have the option of using force--or not. The gods also are alert to issues of justice and injustice, and I may choose not to act in my own defense, for many reasons.

But as far as the god of the hunt is concerned, I certainly may.

It was out of this sense that I began to train in the use of a sword.

The athame I was given was sharp, hard steel. But a weapon on its own is only a symbol of power or will, and symbols that are not immediately experienced in the flesh stay mere abstractions in the mind. To really take on the power of choice that the weapon was meant to convey, I had to take it up physically in some way, and learn its use.

Using live steel was out of the question. My aim was never to learn street fighting--I had previously taken karate and aikido, after all--but to grant myself a more mental, emotional, and spiritual skill. So I chose the most dramatic, showy, symbol-laded weapon I could think of, a sword. And, because actually hurting myself or someone else was not the point, I chose a padded sword, a boffer. I sought out teachers from the members of my Pagan church who had training through the Society of Creative Anachronism, a group that also does not use edged weapons in combat, but wields them with force just the same.

And I practiced. High blocks, low blocks, parrying that led to blows inside my opponent's guard, how close we could stand before we were within striking distance. (If the swords are close enough to cross, you are in killing distance.) We practiced two-handed strokes, one-handed strokes, European hand-and-a-half style and Japanese kendo style... whatever my teachers had to offer.

The hard part was never receiving blows. The hard part was learning the level of relaxed alertness that led to control, and balancing relaxation and power. (My lack of that balance was what eventually caused me to injure my back, and cost me my ability to engage in the sport ever again.)

And the hardest part of all was that, in my lack of control, I would sometimes strike my opponent illegally, with a forbidden head-shot, or a wild smack to the neck or face. Even with boffers, injuries are possible. Even with boffers, it was horrible to hurt another person--much, much harder than being hurt myself.

And this is one of the things I think is true of women in our culture. Men, perhaps, are overly ready to turn to violence in their affairs. Women, however, are too often so afraid of hurting others--and not just physically--that we actually can become clumsy, and wind up causing more pain, to others as well as ourselves, than if we were less cringing about the possibility of pain.

I learned--or began to learn, because I have still got a long way to go--to allow others to be in the game with me. Taking risks myself I was already pretty good at. But I had to learn to allow others who were willing to do so to put themselves at risk, too. For, in the final analysis, we were not on opposite "sides", my opponents and I. We were dancing together, both delighting in our movement and our skill and our courage, and both equally willing to face the risk of momentary pain.

There's a lot in human relationships that is like that. I think I learned a few things about being honestly and fully present in relationships in my time with the sword. And while I'm unsure these are lessons that everyone needs to learn, or would learn in this way, I feel clear that the ability to accept another's willingness to risk himself or herself, in love or in play, is a gift. And not the least of the gifts I have had from the horned god, either.

Sparring is play combat. For me, at least, it led to real growth.

I mentioned that it was not an obligation to use force that I felt Herne offered me, but the option. That is an important distinction to me. As I grow in my Quaker identity, I try to listen carefully for the ways that Spirit is leading me in the peace testimony. And while I try to be alert to leadings around the use of physical force and violence, I have not so far had a clear sense that physical force in all forms is always wrong. I am not clear that physical violence in my immediate self-defense is wrong, particularly if I do not take life.

I do feel very clear that I should never take up weapons or go to war in any cause whatsoever. Moreover, while Herne may have given me a sense that I have the right to some forms of self-defense, he does not shield me from the consequences of such an act. As a Quaker, I think that those consequences include not only the possibility of increasing the frequency and severity of violence in the world, and a risk of damage to my spirit, but in some ways worst of all, that I would sadden and burden the God of Light I have since come to know.

My peace testimony began in my revulsion and despair at the destruction of 9/11, and with the sudden and powerful stop to my sense of the acceptability of organized violence between societies.

It has not grown, this stop, to a sense that the use of force--limited and the least possible force--on the part of police officers is wrong, for instance. It has not grown to a sense that I must not use non-lethal force in my own immediate defense.

And it certainly has not grown to a sense that my enjoyment of what might be called play violence, either in sparring with padded weapons or in attacking imaginary dragons and orcs in role playing games, is wrong.

* * *

It might be fair to ask, how has my peace testimony changed my life, in that case? If there are spiritual gifts that are rooted in my participation in mock combat, are there others that have been cultivated since? And are there ways that my actions, however they may not be in conflict with my inward peace testimony, may mar my witness in the world?

These are still open questions with me, to some extent. But as I said earlier, it is perhaps time to take stock of where I've come on this journey so far.

Along those lines, I will continue this exploration, in another post, focused on how I have been changed by the Spirit of Peace during my time among Friends.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Cat, I really know that I should sit with this and reflect on my comments. When, however have I ever done something that I should, especially when it requires caution, and the knowlege that I would, most likely, never get back to it.

That said, you described the up side, or joy and excitement,of my war experiances. When I think about them, I know that I have never felt so alive. I would get home from a crazy day full of excitement at having cheated death. I knew that I was alive. I watched friends fall out of the sky and explode on impact, but I
was alive. I was living with fear and the joy and the pain, but I knew that I was alive.

I knew that every breath could be my last, but I tried not to dwell in that knowlage. I know I saved lifes, I'm quite sure I've taken lifes. I'm very conflicted on what I feel about life and the way I am living it.

And this is taking a lot longer than the time I have so I will leave it as a half formed idea that I hope to explore someday.

Hope I havn't gone to far astray on this post.

Peace
Glenn
Mary Ellen said…
Cat, I have not had the experience of physically putting myself out there in the way you describe - it doesn't sound like the kind of violence implied by "living by the sword." Your writing carries me into your experience, to a degree - it feels exhilarating. I have also had an experience where I was harmed - and I did what I could to defend myself, which at least delayed things enough that help arrived. I never took it the next step in training for self-defense - or really reflected on how this experience shaped or contradicted my understanding of the peace testimony. It might be good to resurrect those memories and see what I now, on reflection, think - about violence and women, for one thing. Thanks for, as ever, such lucid and thought-provoking writing.
Joy said…
Cat, you wrote: Women, however, are too often so afraid of hurting others--and not just physically--that we actually can become clumsy, and wind up causing more pain, to others as well as ourselves, than if we were less cringing about the possibility of pain.

This rings so true in me, and I appreciate your statement. I wonder how much that has translated from the physical to the emotional for me.

Now in my 50s and attending a Friends meeting where I can sit with how I live the Peace Testimony, I am slowly learning more about myself. It helps to read the thoughts of others. Thank you so much for posting your thoughts/feelings on this.

Glen, you might be interested in Dr Ed Tick's teachings on helping veterans deal with the conflict you mention. He's a psychotherapist and Shaman who has been working with veterans since Viet Nam. I've heard him speak in person and on podcasts by Shaman Christina Pratt.
Erik said…
Almost everything you wrote here resonates with my own experience (other than the fact that I'm male and and an only child... :)

Aikido for me is definitely about peace, *and* about reconnecting mind to body, *and* about my spirituality (in my case it's mostly about Athena rather than Herne, but that association - and the cross-gender connection, which I find interesting now that I think about it! - is a very important aspect of the practice).

I'm very sorry that you can no longer practice; I hope that you will find the window that opens.
Yewtree said…
I wonder if the difference is that sword-play and martial arts are ritualised "violence" rather than actual violence. By putting it into a safe controlled context with rules, it becomes, as you suggest, a dance and a ritual, not uncontrolled rage. As you pointed out, if you lost control and did a head-shot, that was bad, and negated the point of the sword-play.

I'm also with you on the thing about women owning our power; it's very important.
Ryan Sutton said…
I love hearing about your experiences with swordplay. In college, I took a fencing course, not once, but twice, signing on for the advanced course. It is indeed physical, balancing, requiring alertness, awareness, and a readiness to really put yourself out there fully. There's little room for self doubt. And yes, it can HURT! But... it was never done with the intention to kill or inflict harm in another person. It wasn't done for violence's sake. It was an art, a dance as you say, two people moving in rhythm, getting to really know and learn one another, on a physical level of intimacy. It was always friendly.

I more love hearing about your love of Herne, my own patron God. He chose me a little over a year ago, and it warms my heart to see somebody else who sees him in the same way. *much love*
Daniel said…
I was thinking about this same topic just last night---but from the other direction. I practice iaido with a live blade, and every now and then, it strikes my funnybone to realize I'm concentrating *really hard* on waving around a sharp piece of metal that will probably never see the outside of my office or dojo. (I mean, what am I going to do with it, exactly? "Ha HA, mugger! Your .22 is meaningless in the face of my superior swordsmanship!")

I mean, it applies a bit less, because iaido is repeated kata instead of sparring, but I think the end result and reasoning is the same. We become better people for having mastered the skills, and no one has to get (seriously) hurt or killed. Odd as it may be, it's really the best of both worlds.
Pitch313 said…
I don't think that vigorous play or active sports are "violent" in quite the same way as no-holds-barred assault, combat, or acts intended to maim or kill.

Young and inspired by movies like "The Sea Hawk," I tried my hand a fencing. I discovered, to my chagrin, that I really did not have one, and moved on to other sports. But it was always--morally--clear to me that this martial art was not the same thing as wounding or killing with a blade.

Non-violence has never meant--for me--that somebody has to abandon commonsense survival responses. Even though I do realize that some individuals may, as a conscientious act, do just that. I suppose that I mean that, at least as individuals and small communities, we ought to respond to violence with appropriate counter-violence. Without too much concern for any and all possible moral contradictions.
Karen said…
To me, the traditional Chinese martial arts (wushu) are the embodiment of non-violence. They teach body-awareness; the importance of balance; a clear understanding of one's own limits and competences; discipline; courage and the shedding of distorted thinking; confidence without arrogance; the least harmful way to counter a violent assault; remaining calm and compassionate in the face of violent opposition; and the value of walking away. It makes utter, perfect sense to me that they have been created and cultivated by Buddhist orders. Taught well and learned deeply, they are - to me - essentially peaceful.

For me, pacifism is not passive-ism, but an active, dynamic peacefulness. That doesn't mean never defending yourself; it means defending yourself when it's necessary to do so, and avoiding tipping over into violence. Famously, in Britain many moons ago, a 9-year old karate black belt wrested a would-be adult sexual assailant off her and threw him across the road so that she could run for help. He turned up at a hospital with two dislocated elbows and whiplash, and she identified him and provided a clear and cogent statement which allowed the Crown Prosecution Service to take him to court. That child caused physical harm, but she was not violent. She did not beat the man up, and she did not lose control; she simply did what she had to do and could do in no other way, then ran for help and went through the correct official channels. There can be a huge difference between hurting someone and doing them violence, and that difference lies in intention and personal responsibility.

I think I have just talked myself into tai chi classes.
Khalila RedBird said…
Cat, we've intersected a couple of times along our paths -- remember that first silent Meeting of the Society of Friendly Witches at Free Spirit Gathering. And you were my teacher in my first course at Cherry Hill. Now I find we are retired sisters of the sword. Hi.

I took up fencing in college, followed by a hiatus of maybe 16 years, until freedom from my first husband allowed me to return with joy and intensity. I finally had to hang up my sword in 1998, after blowing out a knee at the national championships -- arthritis and overweight make the footwork a bad idea.

I became a Quaker over 20 years before I became a Pagan, and the pacifist spirit is embedded in mine. My fencing became part of my ministry in the interest of peace.

The nature of a fencing bout is, by the rules, "a frank and courteous encounter" between two people, equally equipped and abiding equally by a set of rules. Within those rules, for that encounter, each must preserve his best chance at victory or be denied the win and further participation. For the duration of such an encounter, my opponent -- of whatever skill, gender, rank, nationality or other distinction -- was obliged to treat this dumpy old lady as an equal. It was good experience for quite a few people -- middle aged male military officers, overcharged adolescents, my own sons and husband.

My goal was equal opportunity and treatment for women in a male-dominated arena. I took up sabre -- to the horror of many male sabre fencers in the 80s. Now women's sabre is in the Olympics.

It may not seem like much compared to the major threats to world peace, but there is a movement toward people greeting each other as equals which is picking up its pace.

I had to marshal quite a few aspects of the arguments for fencing as a pacifist testimony, but I did manage to convince our Monthly Meeting, in 1987, to allow us to have an arch of swords leading out of the Meetinghouse after our wedding.

While I was campaigning for women's sabre, my practice sabre was dedicated to the Lady's service and served as my athame. When the time came to lay aside that quest -- which had been taken up by younger hands with more influence -- I did so ritually. Only a few years later, I laid the sabre aside for good.

Perhaps the biggest lesson in all of these stories -- yours, mine, the others who comment -- is to recognize a knee-jerk reaction when you have one, stop, and let all the meanings, threads, and implications come through: ask "what else might be going on here?"

Peace,
RedBird
Chas S. Clifton said…
Good post, Cat.

Popular posts from this blog

Bears Eat My Lettuce

I love where I live;  since moving to our new home four years ago, I've been able to build a relationship with a piece of land for the first time since I was a child.  It's everything a dirt-worshipping Pagan could ask for.  I have a garden, and I grow much of my own food, and that is as much a spiritual delight as a taste treat.  And I have woods again as neighbors: glacial boulders, white pines and black birches, owls and white-tailed deer.

And bears.

And the bears eat my lettuce.



I'm not kidding about that.  Oh, it's winter now, and the bears are huddled up in their dens.  But this past spring, I grew lettuce.  Award winning, gorgeous lettuce: three different kinds!  They were nourished to extraordinary size and succulence by the cool, wet weather we had, and each night, I would gather just a few outer leaves, knowing that careful tending would mean tasty salads for months.

And then, over the course of three days, the bears ate every single one of my lettuce plants…

The Saturday Farm

I love Saturdays.

I have come to think of the work that I do on Saturdays as "farming."  Now, I know it isn't farming--not really.  We have a medium-sized vegetable garden and two dogs, and that's not a farm, by any stretch of the imagination. 

But I keep thinking of a comment Joel Salatin made in Yes Magazine once, about how Americans have become used to thinking of our homes as centers of consumption, but how once, thinking of your home as a center of production (typically, a farm, for most of us for most of our history) was the norm.

And between trying to live with less plastic junk and trying to eat more sustainably and locally, Saturdays at home have become very productive days.  And that productivity--the willingness to substitute patience, skill, and thrift for consumption--I've come to think of as a species of farming.  (My apologies to actual farmers, whose work I increasingly appreciate.  But thinking in this way works for me, somehow.)

First thing this…

On Activism and Ordinary Acts

One of the dangers of being Quaker--or Pagan--is a privilege at the same time.

Quakers and Pagans share a somewhat counter-cultural view of our society.  In slightly different ways, most Quakers and most Pagans believe that human society is flawed in bitterly destructive ways that must be confronted and changed.  We look out at a world burdened by the selfish exploitation of whole nations of human beings, and of the ecosystem itself, and we know that things as they are are not OK.

The privilege and the danger that arises from this is that of associating with activists.

It's a privilege, of course, to have a chance to be inspired by those who are willing to risk imprisonment or even death to be faithful to their spiritual convictions.  This inspirational force is excellent for warding off complacency and the kind of internal self-congratulation that degrades possessing a moral compass into mere spiritual materialism and self-worship.

When I have done some small thing outside the no…