I learned to read early; I can't remember a time when I didn't know how to read. And in the beginning, I'm sure read what every young child reads: picture books picked out by my parents.
|The Wilbraham Free Library|
And that small nook was where the fairy tale books lived.
It's only now, as an adult, that it comes to me how odd it was that a child who had not yet entered elementary school was curled up week after week with books by Andrew Lang: The Blue Fairy Book, The Yellow Fairy Book, The Red Fairy Book, The Brown Fairy Book... those books were my best friends. Of course I loved Beatrix Potter's wonderful books, too (is anything more wonderful to a small child's hands than books sized just at the right scale for them?) but it was the Fairy Books, with their quaint Edwardian diction and detailed line drawings that really spoke to me.
Or perhaps it was simply that the books were shelved at the right height, in the right sort of comfortable
|Ralph Fletcher Seymour, Bookplate|
And then... they closed down my wonderful castle of a library.
After a year of book mobile books, the library reopened in a dazzlingly modern, enormous new building... and, uninitiated as I was in the ways of Dewey Decimal, I searched not for the folk tale section where my old friends would have been, but for the nicest reading nook, and so I discovered fiction.
As I write these words, I'm aware of the controversy that has raged this year over which Pagans are or are not "actual polytheists," worshipping "real gods." The identification of an actual problem--the obliviousness too many Wiccans, Druids, and other well-established Pagan groups sometimes have about other forms of Paganism--has been muddled up together with a range of grievances and grudges. In the midst of this muddle, a few angry voices have been raised to condemn Wicca for being syncretistic and "Romanticized"--having roots in the late flowering of the Romantic movement that popularized a host of idealistic notions of what pre-Christian Europe might have been.
I'm here to plead guilty to that last charge.
I'll go farther. I suspect that I am Wiccan in part because it is syncretistic, and because it does have roots, in part, in the Victorian and Romantic projections of what a pagan past might have been... based, in part, on fairy tales, folk tales, and the speculations of people like the Brothers Grimm.
I didn't know it at the time, but when I was six years old and wolfing down as many fairy tales as I could, I was filling my mental and emotional attic with a certain kind of cultural furniture. My dreaming mind is stuffed full of glass mountains no mortal can climb, fish that can speak and grant wishes, and assorted fairies, witches, goblins and dwarves who bring challenges to the hero of the tale--voices from an Otherworld, possessed of a tricky wisdom.
It is no surprise that, with a subconscious filled with the stories of my Western culture's longings and with a syncretistic vision of a past that never--quite--was, it would be the figure of the Witch that would beckon to me when I found my own mystical bent. I graduated from Lang to Frazer's Golden Bough and W.Y. Evans-Wentz's The Fairy Faith in Celtic Countries, and eventually found my way to Margot Adler's Drawing Down the Moon and Leland's Aradia. I'm sure her descriptions of modern-day Witches had resonance for me in part because of the borrowings of those earlier authors.
Did they distort what they borrowed? They did. Did their projections of a shining Celtic Twilight, lost in the mists of time, serve to hide the very real abuses of an Imperialist age, as American myths of the "noble savage" hid the racism and oppression we acted out on American Indians? I rather think they did. Which is a sad and bitter thing to own, when I look with my historical eyes, and I do understand those who reject the syncretism of my ancestors--my Victorian and Edwardian ancestors, whose ideas formed the matrix from which modern Wicca flowered-- because of it.
I am a product of that culture. I feel compelled to own its excesses as well as its beauties as my own, for better and for worse.
Moreover, I didn't first encounter my culture as a historian, reading with the mind of an adult. I first encountered these repackaged myths and stories, not as a little Imperialist, but as a five year old girl, with an unformed mind and a heart already longing for Mystery. This is the soil from which I grew.
Mystery comes to us in the shapes we're ready to see. My mind was not formed for the historically correct, precise scholarship of today's Reconstructionist Paganism. My mind was formed by the stories of my culture, here and now, the glorious and the ignominy of who my Western people have been. Conquerers, apologists, poor scholars, perhaps. But Lang opened my mind to Frazer, who opened my mind to Evans-Wentz, who opened my mind to Yeats... and to Wicca and the whole modern Western occultist strain of mysticism.
(Thank goodness I was born before the era of the Disney home video. How on earth do children furnish their minds out of Disney home videos?)
The culture that I grew out of, the mental and emotional compost of everything that the developed world was 100 years ago, is a soil uniquely appropriate to me, a modern American woman. This is the collection of symbols that formed the language that my gods now use to speak to me--gods, land spirits, spirits of the natural world, and all the other Shining Ones around us in the world.
I am not saying that the gods are archetypes, or figures of my unconscious. I don't believe that. However, I do believe that the gods can speak to me through archetypes, through dreams and visions that were formed by my unconscious... as Wicca was formed by those same symbols, that same layer of cultural sediment.
I am not saying that those who choose a more scholarly path are doing something wrong. I can't really speak for anyone's spiritual experiences but my own, and I'm not trying to do so.
But I do see it as legitimate, to eat and drink spiritual food grown in the same cultural soil that grew me--as legitimate as it is to eat the tomato that grew in my backyard this summer, despite the fact that tomatoes are not native to my New England soil. The tomatoes that are growing here now? They're native, now, for me, in a way no older, purer food could be.
Quakers have a saying, with regards to vocal ministry, the practice of giving voice to the promptings of Spirit felt within a Quaker meeting: "The water always tastes of the pipes." Meaning, even inspired ministry, faithfully transmitted, is going to use the vocabulary, the knowledge, the basic understandings of the minister. Even while we communicate something outside ourselves, we lend it a flavor of ourselves.
In the case of Wicca, this is one of the attractions of the path. The gods probably are not as I understand them, through the distorting lens of Victorian spiritual projections, with all that added cultural baggage.
But since the gods are probably not understandable to human minds at all, that does not seem nearly as much a liability to me as it is an asset, the power those symbols have deep in my earliest life. The gods--whoever, whatever they are--seem perfectly able to use those symbols to speak to me down deep, underneath my notional self, down where my roots are.
For me, the water tastes of pipes lined with fairy gold. And that... is just right.